<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK: only 5% would pay to read online news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wirefresh.com/uk-only-5-would-pay-to-read-online-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wirefresh.com/uk-only-5-would-pay-to-read-online-news/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=uk-only-5-would-pay-to-read-online-news</link>
	<description>A snappy new tech blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chatton</title>
		<link>http://www.wirefresh.com/uk-only-5-would-pay-to-read-online-news/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirefresh.com/?p=255#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Dan straight! Who&#039;s going to pay to read Murdoch&#039;s sites when you can get the same story at the BBC - and probably read better coverage anyway.

Charging for content would be terrible news, especially for the less well off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan straight! Who&#8217;s going to pay to read Murdoch&#8217;s sites when you can get the same story at the BBC &#8211; and probably read better coverage anyway.</p>
<p>Charging for content would be terrible news, especially for the less well off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
